The constitutional balance of power, where the President acts as the formal Head of State while the Prime Minister exercises real executive authority.
Perhaps his most persistent critique is directed at the electoral system. He has starkly highlighted that the First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) system, especially in a multi-cornered contest, often results in representatives elected by a minority of voters. He pointed out that about 78% of the members in the Lok Sabha, at one point, were elected without securing a majority of the votes polled, with some winning on as little as 7% to 12% of the total electorate. In his interview for the 60th Republic Day, Dr. Kashyap argued that it should be mandatory for a candidate to secure over 50% of the votes, with a runoff election held the very next day if no one achieves this threshold. our political system by subhash kashyap top
One of Dr. Kashyap’s most persistent themes is the “vitiated” nature of India’s contemporary political system. In a 2012 lecture in Patna, he declared that the Indian political system had been profoundly corrupted due to . He argued that the country is passing through a critical phase that poses a direct threat to democracy, which can only be saved through massive parliamentary, administrative, and judicial reforms. The constitutional balance of power, where the President
Our Parliament – Dive deep into the procedures, history, and functions of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. He pointed out that about 78% of the
In one of his notable works, Sustainable Good Governance, Development and Democracy , Kashyap has argued that the three traditional pillars of the state—the legislature, executive, and judiciary—alone cannot accomplish the goals of good governance. He has advocated for , including the news media, civil society, and political parties, to work in tandem with each other through a framework of ‘checks and balances’ to achieve sustainable good governance.
Despite its strengths, Dr. Kashyap notes that the system currently faces severe strains: